| QTY COMPLEX INACTIVE ACTIVE |
| 1 Bunker (1006) 0 1 |
| - - |
| 1 1 |
Gets:
| Sensor Profile: 11%
Outpost consisting of only:
|-Complexes Report-------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| QTY COMPLEX INACTIVE ACTIVE |
| 1 Hiport (1016) 0 1 |
- - |
| 1 1 |
| |
| Sensor Profile: -41%
Hiports appear harder to spot than bunkers <g>
Insight anyone?
| QUOTE (Andy @ Jan 2 2004, 05:45 PM) |
| You likely had a ship landed at the firsst outpost. The docked ship mass is added to the mass of the outpost. |
No ships at the 1st outpost. Admittedly there is a GP there.. but it only reads at 1k to scans.
| QUOTE |
| No ships at the 1st outpost. Admittedly there is a GP there.. but it only reads at 1k to scans. |
Its most likely docked mass - the mu's shown does not include what is docked.
| QUOTE (Howellers @ Jan 2 2004, 02:37 PM) |
| Outpost consisting of only: | 1 Bunker (1006) 0 Gets: | Sensor Profile: 11% Outpost consisting of only: Hiport (1016) 0 1 | - - | | | Sensor Profile: -41% |
I tested the outpost in question, swapping the single bunker for a single hiport. The sensor profile went from 11% to 457% so we can clearly see that there is something else at work in this instance.
[1] The bunkers surface area is set to more than 1000 - this seems likely as thats what defines the profile.
[2] There is some 'stuck' docked mass - will go away after maint.